quit smoking support @ woofmang.com people helping people beat the addiction to nicotine
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jimotter
Quit Date: November 19, 2003
Posts: 2411 Location: Everett Washington
|
Posted: November 10, 2007 4:56 AM Post subject: Is Congress going to Finally Help? |
|
|
WASHINGTON - Congress is taking new whacks at the cigarette industry, banning tobacco sales in Senate buildings and — more importantly — seeking a significant federal tax increase on cigarettes.
The industry, once a lobbying behemoth, is quietly working against the tax bill. But it lacks the clout it once wielded.
Several key lawmakers said they have had no recent contacts with tobacco lobbyists. And both houses have signaled a willingness to raise the cigarette tax if other provisions of a children's health bill can be resolved.
"I think the industry has tried to do things more quietly, largely because they obviously know how popular a tobacco tax is," said Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA. The health advocacy group supports a proposed $35 billion increase in the State Children's Health Insurance Program, which a higher cigarette tax would finance.
House and Senate negotiators are trying to craft a veto-proof version of the bill. President Bush says he would veto it because it calls for a 61 cents-per-pack increase in the federal excise tax on cigarettes, taking it to $1.
The House came within about a dozen votes of overriding Bush's veto of a similar bill last month. The bill's supporters are offering to change program eligibility rules in hopes of picking up enough Republicans to make the revised bill veto-proof. The proposed cigarette tax increase is not at issue, leaders of both parties said.
Philip Morris USA, the nation's largest cigarette maker, sponsors a Web site, mailings and a toll-free number urging people to ask Congress to sustain Bush's veto. "Taxing smokers is unfair," the materials say, adding that states have increased sales taxes on cigarettes 73 times since 2000.
"We are sharing our position with legislators," Philip Morris spokesman Bill Phelps said in an interview. The company also has encouraged tobacco growers, retailers and wholesalers to get involved, he said.
But tobacco's critics say health concerns have deeply eroded the industry's influence in Congress.
"The country and elected officials have really made a turn," said Bill Corr, executive director of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Cigarette companies, he said, "don't have the opportunity to go in and push members as much."
The tobacco industry gave $3.5 million to federal campaigns and candidates in the 2006 election cycle, ranking 64th among major industry groups, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Ten years earlier, it gave $10.5 million, ranking 26th.
Some Democratic lawmakers have groused that House Minority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Mo., is married to a lobbyist who has worked for Philip Morris' parent company. Blunt, who is monitoring the children's health negotiations, says his wife no longer lobbies on tobacco issues.
In a landmark 1998 settlement of many lawsuits, four major tobacco companies agreed to help states pay for smoking-related health care costs. They paid $52.6 billion from 2000 to 2005, the government reported.
In some ways, tobacco's presence on Capitol Hill is literally waning. The Senate Rules Committee recently ordered shops in the Capitol and all Senate office buildings to end cigarette sales by Jan. 1.
Cigarettes are still sold in the Longworth House Office Building. But last January, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., banned smoking in the ornate Speaker's Lobby, just off the House floor.
"The days of smoke-filled rooms in the United States Capitol are over," she said, citing the risks of cancer and respiratory diseases.
Other congressional actions could have a far greater impact on the industry. A Senate committee recently approved legislation that would, for the first time, allow federal regulation of cigarettes. The bill, also pending in the House, would require the Food and Drug Administration to restrict tobacco advertising, regulate warning labels and remove hazardous ingredients.
_________________ _________________
Never give up on yourself. We are so worth the effort. Smoking creates nothing but misery for us and those around us. Smoking is socially unacceptable everywhere we go. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Zuzu
Quit Date: -
Posts: 962 Location: Marin
|
Posted: November 10, 2007 4:35 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Not that we're supposed to discuss politics here... er... but... I have a difficult time with the idea of children's health care/insurance being dependent on people continuing to smoke. Why would you ever want someone to stop smoking if their continued smoking funded programs for your children?
They did something similar with cigarette tax and education and California. I don't want public programs that serve my daughter and/or her friends to be dependent on someone's ongoing addiction.
I'd feel much much better about $ from cigarette taxes going to support more research into smoking cessation aides and programs, supporting proven strategies (fund Kevin's site and the ffsonline program, etc. - fully staff the sites and provide expert resources, etc.) and funding prevention interventions.
-Zuzu |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daggy12
Quit Date: -
Posts: 678 Location: Palm Bay, FL
|
Posted: November 12, 2007 11:49 AM Post subject: |
|
|
I like your point of veiw Zuzu. I dont even want to think about how much taxes i have paid over the years just to smoke. _________________
Life can only be "understood" by looking backward, but must be "lived" by looking forward.
Patty |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kannprint
Quit Date: April 10, 2004
Posts: 4988 Location: St. Louis, MO
|
Posted: November 12, 2007 12:34 PM Post subject: |
|
|
You've put an entire new slant on things, Zu, and I totally agree. Why encourage people to kill themselves with cigarettes in order to fund children's health programs. Makes no sense. _________________
LIVE WELL, LAUGH OFTEN, LOVE MUCH.
Jo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nosmoex
Quit Date: July 4, 2007
Posts: 198
|
Posted: November 15, 2007 9:16 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Jim! Great post. Interesting. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Barbara K.
Quit Date: December 23, 2004
Posts: 5977
|
Posted: November 21, 2007 11:34 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Thank Jim.
Interesting take on it Zuzu. I would perfer your idea also but then again a significant tax increase would perhaps deter children from smoking due to the higher costs. _________________
Obstacles don't have to stop you. If you run into a wall, don't turn arouind and give up. Figure out how to climb it, go through it, or work around it.
Blessings,
Barbara K. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|